Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 157% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '20 at 17:39
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9980XE-$1,097 2,201 User benchmarks, average bench 83% CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 74.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 248 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 952 85% 717 Pts	64-Core 2,923 181% 2,923 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 371E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	142% Outstanding	Lighting 185 Reflection 202 Parallax 203 151% 197 fps	MRender 262 Gravity 202 Splatting 134 156% 199 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 919GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 426 426 424 424 425 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 471 Mixed 407 SusWrite 426 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 99.7 4K Mixed 46.3 162% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 347 262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 425 425 424 424 424 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 471 Mixed 386 SusWrite 426 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 36.1 134% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 348 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 121%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB 44,418 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 272 284 279 282 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 377 Write 375 Mixed 284 SusWrite 280 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 21.7 93% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 175 150% 221 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 279GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 111 120 119 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 136 Write 98.8 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 114 68% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 107%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 140 141 142 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 146 Write 144 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 141 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 132 133 132 133 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 114 Write 29 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 128 63% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 75%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 928GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 49 48 49 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 102 Write 71.3 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 48.3 51% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 994GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 926GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 48 49 50 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 91.7 Write 104 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 48.6 55% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2932 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 50.7 MC Mixed 32.5 114% 40 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 9 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299X AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 174%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 189%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299X AORUS MASTER

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	82x
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	79x
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples	52x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	43x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	41x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	28x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	24x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	19x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	83x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	61x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $1,237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16