User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer
MotherboardAcer Garp_BA
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160906
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 13:31
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3700
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
25.5% Poor
Memory 34.9
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 47.8
22% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 93.6
8-Core 95.9
13% 94.8 Pts
64-Core 94.8
6% 94.8 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 100F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.97
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 2.66
2% 2.26 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 233 297 299 306 309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 312
Write 322
Mixed 249
SusWrite 290
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 25.1
84% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 151
115% 154 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback