Asus CG8565

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 08 '20 at 09:37
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 567
64% 502 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 364.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 74
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 64
60% 70 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 57.7
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 209 141 132 125 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
77.3% Very good
Read 258
Write 247
Mixed 238
SusWrite 161
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 48.8
153% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 124%
NSI WD20EARX-00PASB0 2TB
241GB free, PID 1650
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 28 28 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.6% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 34.2
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 28.6
42% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 1.2 MB/s
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
7GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.8 5 6.9 6.6 6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 2.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 6.1
10% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 55.4
72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $545
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback