Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '20 at 01:54
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 60.9 2-Core 104 49% 78.4 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 304 33% 263 Pts	64-Core 276 17% 276 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.4% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 105 Parallax 97.2 84% 102 fps	MRender 93.4 Gravity 95.8 Splatting 97.7 79% 95.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 140 54 55 55 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 496 Write 441 Mixed 385 SusWrite 84 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 33.2 116% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 84.2 DQ Mixed 115 92% 132 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 121GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 377 388 374 321 322 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 384 Write 387 Mixed 366 SusWrite 359 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 32.1 105% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 94.3 DQ Write 92.8 DQ Mixed 93.4 70% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 79%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 202GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 423 430 435 442 461 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 474 Mixed 458 SusWrite 437 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 51.7 167% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 364 274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 136GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 132 137 139 139 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 162 Write 144 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 137 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 472GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 96 96 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 114 Write 104 Mixed 90 SusWrite 97.6 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	63.7% Good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 19.9 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 21.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)