Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '20 at 16:15
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 76.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 268 87% 160 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 669 74% 585 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37A7) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.5% Average	Lighting 53.9 Reflection 71.6 Parallax 53.8 44% 59.8 fps	MRender 83.3 Gravity 80.9 Splatting 62.1 60% 75.4 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 451 443 389 433 422 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,395 Write 2,142 Mixed 1,658 SusWrite 445 370% 1,660 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 55.1 199% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,373 DQ Write 1,081 DQ Mixed 1,303 954% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 355%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 221 221 216 203 210 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 213 Mixed 85.9 SusWrite 212 131% 180 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 1.3 324% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 136%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 7TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 153 148 152 153 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 116 Write 117 Mixed 101 SusWrite 151 90% 121 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.7 388% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4B8G2J2666A15D 4x8GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.7% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 21.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 15.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 128%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	683x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	579x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	481x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	586x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	382x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	246x

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $788

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16