Samsung N150P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung N150P  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG N150P
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 18:18
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N455
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 5.5
2-Core 11.3
24% 26.6 Pts
4-Core 10.6
8-Core 11.7
2% 11.1 Pts
64-Core 11.5
1% 11.5 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 41 51 49 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 53
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 47.9
35% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 45%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
6GB free, PID 02a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.3
6% 4.75 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.49% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback