HP ENVY TS m6 Sleekbook

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP ENVY TS m6 Sleekbook (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1995
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160718
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '20 at 19:09
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5745M APU 6,689 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Memory 10.3 1-Core 29.2 2-Core 43.9 15% 27.8 Pts	4-Core 81 8-Core 114 12% 97.7 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8610G 5,188 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 1995) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	4.11% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 5.31 4% 5.37 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 6 4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.11% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 779GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61F1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 75 107 112 91 74 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 155 Write 98.7 Mixed 138 SusWrite 103 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 13.7 49% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 78 DQ Mixed 35.1 43% 76 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 102%
hp x900w 124GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 23GB free, PID 8140 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 75 82 85 81 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 135 Write 49.9 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 76.5 88% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 29% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB 973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 5.2 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 401 10% 401 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ENVY TS m6 Sleekbook Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TS m6 Sleekbook

CPU
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	67x
A10-5745M APUAMDBench 36%, 6,689 samples	14x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	67x
Radeon HD 8610GAMDBench 4%, 5,188 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $160Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	13x
HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 49%, 2,791 samples	11x
HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 2,033 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $309

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16