PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P67X-UD3-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110325 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 30 '20 at 21:03 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 87% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY SSD2SC120GC1DH16T2-T 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 504ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 69 68 68 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
39.2%
Below average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
604GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 169 170 174 173 170 MB/s
|
94.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
pqi IntelligentStick 32GB
20GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.7 MB/s
|
5.63%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
40.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 42x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 33x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 21x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 13x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $403 |