Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 11:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 122
59% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 225
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 232
16% 232 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$142
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.2
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.8% Average
Lighting 182
Reflection 174
Parallax 243
48% 200 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 175
Splatting 125
49% 146 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 53%
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 4.5
2% 6.4 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 8.9
1% 6.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 141 148 148 148 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 433
Mixed 393
SusWrite 169
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 44.9
151% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 344
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $575
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback