Asus PRIME J4005I-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME J4005I-C  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200319
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 22:48
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 47
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 114
42% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 114
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 875E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 3.46
Parallax 2.31
2% 2.68 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 5.96
4% 4.14 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P300 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 304 222 230 284 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 557
Write 429
Mixed 442
SusWrite 252
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 15.6
128% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 302
228% 306 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 173%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 106 104 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 51.6
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 105
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
34GB free
Firmware: 060E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 34.4
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 30.1
24% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 66%
SP TF 8GB
3GB free, PID 0716
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 12.8
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 10.8
17% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.3
143% 2.5 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME J4005I-C Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME J4005I-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback