Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 03 '17 at 02:49
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 1,018
93% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,366
84% 1,366 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 44.6
39% 49 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62.1
49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 1TB-$700
576GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 473
Mixed 471
108% 486 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 30.8
111% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 67.7
72% 122 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
3TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 151
Write 153
Mixed 158
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
69% Good
Read 115
Write 125
Mixed 90.5
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.13
57% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 123
Mixed 117
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.21
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%
HGST Ultrastar He8 Helium 8TB-$94
885GB free
Firmware: A4GNT514 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 101
Write 111
Mixed 93.4
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.43
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 52.1
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 48.9
148% 51.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 21.2
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 131%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $242

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $687
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback