Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '20 at 04:08
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	41%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 39.4 1-Core 91 2-Core 183 54% 105 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 334 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.2% Average	Lighting 61 Reflection 55.7 Parallax 72.5 50% 63 fps	MRender 60.4 Gravity 57.8 Splatting 50 45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$46 14,978 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 585 442 476 503 486 469 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,299 Write 1480 Mixed 1,104 SusWrite 494 246% 1,094 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 95.6 4K Mixed 46.1 156% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 803 DQ Write 521 DQ Mixed 722 522% 682 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 238%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 110 111 110 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 112 Write 112 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 109 71% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 50%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 259GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 96 97 97 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 96.8 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 95.9 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 54%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 458GB free Firmware: 0005SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 136 137 136 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 138 Write 131 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 135 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 77%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 167GB free Firmware: 0001BSM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 65 72 73 72 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 72 Write 73.4 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 70.4 47% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 43%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 1,176 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 56GB free, PID 0743 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 61 68 73 66 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 70 Write 69.6 Mixed 54 SusWrite 63.8 87% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 4.1 258% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 44%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 46GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 52 58 61 57 55 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3200 C16 Series 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	47.1% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 17.8 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	836x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	627x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	296x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	226x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	101x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16