Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '20 at 19:18
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 241 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 725 70% 575 Pts	64-Core 978 60% 978 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% MSI(1462 2825) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Lighting 42.3 Reflection 39.6 Parallax 53.5 34% 45.1 fps	MRender 55.4 Gravity 45.8 Splatting 37.4 37% 46.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SH00E240GB 240GB 371 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0318A0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 381 316 717 430 656 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	157% Outstanding	Read 1,636 Write 213 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 443 128% 595 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 29 125% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 483 DQ Write 758 DQ Mixed 418 373% 553 MB/s
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 208%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 749GB free Firmware: JP4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 131 130 133 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 113 Write 104 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 132 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 2x8GB 7,360 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 42.7 MC Write 40.8 MC Mixed 34.9 113% 39.5 GB/s	SC Read 28.4 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 31 94% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	601x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	153x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	117x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	112x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	50x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	113x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	77x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $344

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16