Asrock Z270 SuperCarrier

Performance Results


Gaming 158% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 132% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 SuperCarrier (all builds)
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '20 at 14:48
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 248 89% 156 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 614 62% 503 Pts	64-Core 614 38% 614 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 4040) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	189% Outstanding	Lighting 280 Reflection 246 Parallax 277 228% 267 fps	MRender 303 Gravity 237 Splatting 144 177% 228 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,974 Write 403 Mixed 536 209% 971 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 63.5 234% 89.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,274 DQ Write 926 DQ Mixed 987 768% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 34GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 478 481 375 87 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 481 Mixed 417 SusWrite 329 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 62.5 211% 74.9 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 359 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 5GB free Firmware: 1.5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 376 Write 387 Mixed 275 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 40.9 173% 68.2 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 318 242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 106%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 806GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 91 91 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 89.4 Write 82.4 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 90 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 32 28 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 19.9 Write 33.8 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 30.6 20% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 10GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 85 77 79 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 73.7 Write 71.5 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 74.2 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 6GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 57 58 65 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 57.8 Write 71.4 Mixed 42 SusWrite 57.4 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 15GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 77 77 77 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 100 Write 104 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 76.5 65% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 20GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 74 78 78 77 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 81.9 Write 75.8 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 77.3 54% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 88%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 7GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 153 Write 158 Mixed 78.2 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.3 221% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 97%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 10GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 89 100 102 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 77.3 Write 77 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 89.8 59% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 38.9 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 33.5 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 44.2 SC Mixed 30.9 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 156%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 SuperCarrier Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 50%

Yacht

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 SuperCarrier

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	59x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	7x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	3x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	7x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	6x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 8313 CL16-16-16 D4-2400 KF3200C16D4/8GX 8313 CL16-16-16 D4-2400 32GBKingstonBench 73%, 8 samples	8x
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 17,846 samples	8x
8GX-D4-3200-MR 08D9 8GX-D4-3000-MR 08D9 8GX-D4-3200-MR 08D9 8GX-D4-3000-MR 32GBUnknownBench 97%, 6 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16