Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X150-PLUS WS-CF (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160330
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '20 at 10:33
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 2,254 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 205 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 601 61% 494 Pts	64-Core 617 38% 617 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.7% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 41.2 Parallax 34 32% 38.3 fps	MRender 32.9 Gravity 34.9 Splatting 32.8 27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 12,601 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 930 950 929 942 920 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 1,632 Write 1,215 Mixed 902 SusWrite 934 261% 1,171 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 48.8 199% 79.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,168 DQ Write 378 DQ Mixed 615 495% 720 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 262%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 107 106 107 108 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 19.5 Write 23.4 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 105 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 66%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 157 160 162 160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 30.2 Write 128 Mixed 33 SusWrite 160 64% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 4x8GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.9% Very good	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 23.1 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 21.4 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	3x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	2x
SSD370S 128GBTranscend $70Bench 74%, 10,510 samples	2x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 83%, 2,656 samples	5x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	3x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	2x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $202

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16