Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 209 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 416 55% 414 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1436 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Lighting 75.6 Reflection 72 Parallax 103 62% 83.6 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 76.3 Splatting 60 56% 69.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 120GB 2,135 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 15GB free Firmware: N1209B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 438 Write 98.7 Mixed 194 53% 244 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 10.8 76% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 91.4 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 13.5 36% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 14.2 Mixed 24.5 15% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.1 38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.B1GS3.AZ30B 2x4GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 28.3 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 22.2 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16