Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 22:49
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 858
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,287
80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 220
Parallax 161
184% 202 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 216
Splatting 100
138% 179 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 155%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1973 1580 1008 692 815 792 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,493
Write 2,265
Mixed 1,538
SusWrite 1,143
416% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 79.5
273% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 938
697% 923 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 295%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
80GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 479 476 479 478 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 441
Mixed 339
SusWrite 477
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 44.4
160% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Pcie SSD 512GB
287GB free
Firmware: E8FM11.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 582 453 401 450 448 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 776
Mixed 406
SusWrite 459
121% 534 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 32.4
88% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 716
530% 695 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 267%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
627GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 65 77 72 70 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 110
Write 98.8
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 72.8
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 35 38 50 59 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 102
Write 111
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 63.3
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 36.3
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 30.3
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback