HP h8-1020at

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1020at  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 14:24
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$194
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 163
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 420
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(1B0A 90A2) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.73% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 9.22
9% 11 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 14.8
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.73%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 114 123 131 144 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 164
Write 144
Mixed 119
SusWrite 132
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 21.1
69% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 20
21% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 119%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
450GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 81 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 82.2
Write 76.5
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 81.5
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 96%
ASMT 2115 1TB
701GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4 8.2 5.9 3.6 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 4.8
5% 3.73 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback