Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 23:07
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 204
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 542
59% 470 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 127
Parallax 125
112% 130 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 124
Splatting 94.2
104% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$84
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 184 245 228 92 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 362
Mixed 238
SusWrite 200
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 47.2
151% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 231
197% 289 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 107%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
230GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 246 243 247 246 247 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 470
Write 249
Mixed 163
SusWrite 246
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 26.2
124% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 58.9
105% 211 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
638GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 404 378 425 452 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 472
Mixed 403
SusWrite 420
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 47.3
168% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 114%
Great: 121%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 100
Write 85
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 68.5
61% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 154 160 162 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 151
Write 149
Mixed 103
SusWrite 159
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89%
Great: 101%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 104 86 101 160 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 30.3
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 28.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback