Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory	57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150304
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '17 at 17:43
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2665 0 619 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 151 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 592 53% 446 Pts	64-Core 1,503 93% 1,503 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 38.6 33% 37 fps	MRender 39.4 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 37.4 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256S1C 256GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 166 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 133 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 60 (A3) Unknown 100 100 30 (A4) Unknown 100 100 14824 (A5) Unknown 100 100 72 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 14 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 52 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 74311 (F2) Unknown 100 100 75943 (F5) Unknown 100 100 118592	83.1% Excellent	Read 472 Write 442 Mixed 414 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 27.7 94% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 75 86% 145 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 111%
Seagate ST31000524NS 43W7625 42C0400IBM 1TB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 139GB free Firmware: BB28 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 73 63 21250553 (03) Spinup time 96 80 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 328 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 148326689 (09) Power-on hours count 50 50 44307 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 153 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 54 724172843 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 64 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 4441 (C2) HDA temperature 43 46 68719476779 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 16 21250553 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	44% Average	Read 78.2 Write 74.7 Mixed 25.4 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.46 107% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 64GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.3% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	5x
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	4x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $234Bench 290%, 10,709 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GBSamsungBench 52%, 85 samples	4x
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hyn... 384GBSamsungBench 83%, 6 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16