Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3-$256 2,019 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 200 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 268 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 249 15% 249 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.77 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.49 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 6.96 5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC66 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,293 Write 29.8 Mixed 37.7 802% 1,120 MB/s	4K Read 420 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 17,537% 140 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF 2x8GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.5 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16