Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 199
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 592
53% 449 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 136
Parallax 127
100% 129 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 124
Splatting 106
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 410 431 441 436 396 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 477
Write 375
Mixed 370
SusWrite 415
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 34
110% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 267
192% 244 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
219GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 369 401 423 394 238 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 423
Write 446
Mixed 372
SusWrite 371
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 28.5
98% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 294
204% 254 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 99%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
196GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1072 846 845 846 842 845 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 2,184
Write 1,935
Mixed 1,659
SusWrite 883
373% 1,665 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 52.4
164% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 382
274% 355 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 208%
Great: 355%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
410GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 85 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 80.7
Write 89.7
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 85.8
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
417GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 174 176 175 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 133
Write 138
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 175
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 113%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
540GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 21 20 21 61 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 72.8
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 40
82% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
163% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IRH2666D464L19S/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 30.6
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 25.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback