PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Ah |
Memory | 0.9 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100609 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 21 '20 at 13:11 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | SAU-User |
Background CPU | 96% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
46%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
|
3.78%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 60 61 55 50 MB/s
|
22.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:01 98 99P5474-014.A00LF ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $100Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 387x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 73x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 60x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 285x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 65x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 55x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 30x |
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 18x |
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $128 |