Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '20 at 16:56
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 77 1-Core 118 2-Core 242 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 747 73% 600 Pts	64-Core 1,006 62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.27 Parallax 4.72 4% 4.45 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 5.78 4% 5.19 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 229 252 252 245 244 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 1,587 Write 357 Mixed 386 SusWrite 290 142% 655 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 11.9 68% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 39.2 DQ Mixed 78.2 86% 153 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 236%
Sandisk S064G 63GB 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 54GB free Firmware: 3.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 178 178 180 180 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 432 Write 182 Mixed 99 SusWrite 179 49% 223 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 12.6 51% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 19 DQ Mixed 20.1 16% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 47%
Intel 330 Series 240GB 1,960 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 222GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 139 143 141 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 427 Write 118 Mixed 162 SusWrite 137 46% 211 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 18.7 69% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 56.5 DQ Mixed 76.6 65% 97 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 91%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 844GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 132 131 130 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 127 Write 132 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 131 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 15 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Kingston 9905678-138.A00G CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Kingston 9905678-042.A00G 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 27.6 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 27.1 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)