Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S (all builds)
Memory	112.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '20 at 17:17
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 69.4 1-Core 150 2-Core 299 91% 173 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 1,180 105% 889 Pts	64-Core 2,806 174% 2,806 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 125 Parallax 136 101% 128 fps	MRender 168 Gravity 120 Splatting 101 103% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 623 525 516 511 502 488 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	202% Outstanding	Read 2,340 Write 1,787 Mixed 1,482 SusWrite 528 341% 1,534 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 52.3 183% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 638 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 296 255% 387 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 340%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB 678 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 90 92 93 95 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 51.5 Write 68.8 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 93.2 52% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.5 162% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 69%
Seagate IronWolf 12TB (2017)-$150 40 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 83 71 70 65 65 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 57.2 Write 87.2 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 71.3 55% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 4x31.8GB 1,068 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.6% Very good	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 27 83% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 27.7 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 177%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 126%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 119%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	32x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $41Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $641

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16