PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Hyrican PC A320M PRO-VD/S (all builds) |
Motherboard | Micro-Star A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181211 |
Uptime | 4.2 Days |
Run Date | Nov 08 '20 at 08:52 |
Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 74 77 76 79 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Intenso Sata III 507GB
210GB free
Firmware: Q0303B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 255 238 277 299 313 MB/s
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$33
532GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 138 143 142 142 142 MB/s
|
95%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
931GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 23 25 24 25 MB/s
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Mass Storage Device 250GB
226GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.1 3.2 2.1 3.2 3.7 MB/s
|
4.74%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
6GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4 3.8 3.7 3.5 5.4 MB/s
|
7.86%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon X4 950 Quad CoreAMDBench 41%, 4,334 samples | 1x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $195Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 1x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 1x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 1x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $459 |