Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario RR503AA-ABU SR2109UK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek NODUSM3
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20061215
Uptime	11.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '20 at 15:32
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ 260 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.47% Terrible	Memory 14.3 1-Core 7 2-Core 10.6 8% 10.6 Pts	4-Core 17.4 8-Core 10.6 2% 14 Pts	64-Core 2.1 0% 2.1 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 8.47% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500 5,613 User benchmarks, average bench 3% PwrHis(1787 2297) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 5.92 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.66 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 5.22 4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: VM10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 29 13 8 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 29.6 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 16.8 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x0.5GB 2,291 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.69% Terrible	MC Read 0.4 MC Write 0.6 MC Mixed 1 2% 0.67 GB/s	SC Read 0.6 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.3 2% 0.77 GB/s	Latency 366 11% 366 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2.69% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16