Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 129% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '20 at 09:01
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 90 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 255 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 841 82% 675 Pts	64-Core 1,325 82% 1,325 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	140% Outstanding	Lighting 200 Reflection 181 Parallax 217 163% 199 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 154 Splatting 128 126% 157 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXZ7100Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,645 Write 1,094 Mixed 583 243% 1,107 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 61.9 210% 75.8 MB/s	DQ Read 940 DQ Write 708 DQ Mixed 448 437% 699 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 39GB free Firmware: SAFM10.D SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 106 98 98 98 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 484 Write 462 Mixed 326 SusWrite 116 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 11.5 103% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 68.6 128% 255 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 95%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 138GB free Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 873 653 652 645 643 647 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	223% Outstanding	Read 1,673 Write 1,491 Mixed 1,012 SusWrite 686 272% 1,215 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 70.1 235% 83.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,042 DQ Write 824 DQ Mixed 927 695% 931 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 223% Great: 259%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250 686 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 635GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 138 132 139 139 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 145 Write 109 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 136 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE630 3TB 1,336 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 647GB free Firmware: MZ6OAA80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 73 74 72 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 68.4 Write 49.8 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 72.9 38% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.9% Very good	MC Read 36 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 22.8 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 19.3 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	200x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	170x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	64x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,076

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)