Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display4096x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 16:42
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 92.3
35% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 148
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1514 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 17.8
14% 16.2 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 17.6
13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 52 55 51 66 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 351
Write 253
Mixed 192
SusWrite 44.6
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 5.8
44% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 33.6
52% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
51GB free
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 89 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 89
Write 95.2
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 88.9
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 70%
Generic External 320GB
11GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 22 21 24 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 20.7
Write 18.1
Mixed 19
SusWrite 21.8
27% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 257 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.5% Poor
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.4
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $148
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback