| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R930 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3118-A2 |
| Memory | 27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140605 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '20 at 13:46 |
| Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
55% 90.6 Pts
|
48% 409 Pts
|
34% 544 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.16
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
13% 16.3 fps
|
15% 18.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba HG6 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 231 227 224 224 225 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
52% 229 MB/s
|
90% 28.8 MB/s
|
115% 154 MB/s
|
|
Unitek ASM1153E 1TB
651GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
22% 29.2 MB/s
|
262% 2.63 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$33
661GB free
Firmware: SND3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 143 143 142 142 MB/s
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
94% 128 MB/s
|
223% 1.63 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
14GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 22 21 23 23 23 MB/s
|
6.82%
Terrible
|
24% 16.8 MB/s
|
7% 0.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.7%
Average
|
45% 15.9 GB/s
|
21% 7.23 GB/s
|
48% 84.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS R930 Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R930
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 4x |
| Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples | 4x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v21stBench 57%, 469 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 5x |
| RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples | 5x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |