Asus H110M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '20 at 15:43
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 201 66% 121 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 346 44% 335 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.8% Below average	Lighting 51.2 Reflection 75.8 Parallax 46.2 42% 57.7 fps	MRender 40.9 Gravity 47.9 Splatting 43.4 36% 44.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 1 10 72 116 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 389 Write 215 Mixed 206 SusWrite 66.2 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 12.6 44% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 76.9 DQ Write 62.6 DQ Mixed 37.9 37% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 466GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 153 176 178 163 175 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 37.7 Write 110 Mixed 52 SusWrite 160 66% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	66.4% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 21.8 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 19 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	414x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	238x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	283x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	218x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	193x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	81x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	57x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16