Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory108.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateMay 08 '17 at 06:10
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2623 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 197
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 745
68% 568 Pts
64-Core 742
46% 742 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 61.5
54% 66.5 fps
MRender 74.2
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 58.7
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9260-8i 4TB
6TB free
Firmware: 2.12
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
407GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 500
Write 400
Mixed 411
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 16.2
76% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 50.6
57% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,655
Write 1,196
Mixed 1,347
311% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 32.7
130% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 58.1
66% 112 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 185%
Great: 283%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 156
Write 130
Mixed 144
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.17
69% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 96%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 131
Mixed 114
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.23
102% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 87%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
30GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 44.8
Write 32.7
Mixed 38.4
48% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.96
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.14
101% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 37%
WD My Passport 259D 4TB
0GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 94.3
Write 81.3
Mixed 68.4
101% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.27
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 31.4
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 18
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $344
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback