Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	84.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	20 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '20 at 10:06
Run Duration	420 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Memory 85.9 1-Core 147 2-Core 297 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 553 8-Core 1,112 98% 833 Pts	64-Core 2,191 136% 2,191 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% Sapphire(1DA2 E417) ≥ 4GB Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.5% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 126 Parallax 174 88% 136 fps	MRender 97.8 Gravity 111 Splatting 80.1 77% 96.4 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 517GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2864 2913 2910 2916 1410 1418 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	325% Outstanding	Read 2195 Write 2,325 Mixed 2192 SusWrite 2,405 515% 2,279 MB/s	4K Read 46.8 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 74.6 215% 71.2 MB/s	DQ Read 738 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 465 353% 488 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 325% Great: 488%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 434GB free Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 435 440 389 369 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 308 Write 283 Mixed 316 SusWrite 400 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 28.7 97% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 176 132% 176 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 45GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,489 Write 1,438 Mixed 531 255% 1,153 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 47.3 168% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 707 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 528 380% 501 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 107 51 36 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 161 Write 130 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 79 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4.5TB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 125 116 126 128 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 108 Write 73 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 127 69% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 96%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 684GB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 130 114 130 129 128 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 6TB free Firmware: RT17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 112 130 127 131 130 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 809GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 113 129 128 132 132 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 90 Write 89.8 Mixed 31 SusWrite 126 61% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 94%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 646GB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 144 160 158 159 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 834GB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 212 214 215 212 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 176 Mixed 91 SusWrite 212 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 1 452% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 252GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 88 89 89 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 117 Write 88 Mixed 81 SusWrite 86.1 69% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.5 5.2 8.3 8.7 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Read 5.5 Write 8.7 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 6.5 5% 7.05 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 36% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 93%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3.5TB free, PID 8016 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 163 162 163 163 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 166 Write 165 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 162 168% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 110% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB 4,021 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 50.1 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 39.9 119% 41.7 GB/s	SC Read 26.8 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 34.4 81% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,332x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,054x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	879x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	510x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	398x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $600Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	361x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	382x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	205x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	157x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	124x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,208

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16