Asrock B550M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B550M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 67.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 878
89% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 401F) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.9
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 300 308 316 309 306 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 488
Mixed 456
SusWrite 317
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 65.4
218% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 24TB
13TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 40 39 49 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 31.7
Write 174
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 54
52% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 28.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 28.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback