| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B250M Performance (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170516 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 26 '20 at 06:35 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.8%
Above average
|
61% 104 Pts
|
35% 263 Pts
|
18% 282 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
EVGA(3842 1160) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
64.2%
Good
|
68% 79.9 fps
|
56% 68.1 fps
| |
|
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
ASRock(1849 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
|
3.67%
Terrible
|
4% 5.23 fps
|
3% 4.47 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 123 119 119 125 122 MB/s
|
78.7%
Very good
|
95% 130 MB/s
|
118% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.4%
Above average
|
56% 19.5 GB/s
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
44% 90.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B250M Performance Builds (Compare 178 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B250M Performance
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 31x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 27x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 27x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 15x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $278 |