| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200827 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 27 '20 at 07:31 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.9%
Very good
|
78% 138 Pts
|
65% 530 Pts
|
58% 934 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.6%
Average
|
42% 54.8 fps
|
54% 65.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1061 1088 705 146 91 79 MB/s
|
191%
Outstanding
|
239% 1,083 MB/s
|
179% 66.2 MB/s
|
388% 553 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
912GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 191 192 193 195 193 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
108% 149 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
103%
Outstanding
|
108% 37.8 GB/s
|
83% 29.1 GB/s
|
52% 77.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 43x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 24x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 19x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 16x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $744 |