Asus VANGUARD B85

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus VANGUARD B85  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 13:05
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 102
2-Core 180
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 411
45% 354 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 108
Parallax 66.8
12% 63.1 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 0.2
33% 46.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 128GB-$170
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 104 93 96 90 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 360
Write 142
Mixed 230
SusWrite 93.6
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 35.4
131% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 202
167% 241 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
1TB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 168 166 168 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 147
Mixed 34
SusWrite 167
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 108%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
338GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 139 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 139
Write 131
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 138
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 0622 DDR3-1600 CL10 8GB 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VANGUARD B85 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus VANGUARD B85 - $7,816

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $7,994
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback