Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	94.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	17.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '21 at 03:01
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 69.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 207 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 711 65% 546 Pts	64-Core 1,106 68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1426) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.4% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 121 Parallax 121 96% 120 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 122 Splatting 107 90% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,376 Write 2,184 Mixed 1,700 464% 2,087 MB/s	4K Read 55.5 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 75.9 247% 85.1 MB/s	DQ Read 795 DQ Write 688 DQ Mixed 734 552% 739 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 197GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 409 398 406 410 406 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 465 Mixed 448 SusWrite 406 102% 453 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 48.6 159% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 370 279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 298GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 91 92 91 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 42.5 Write 72.9 Mixed 51.1 SusWrite 90.9 48% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 474 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 21.5 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 20.7 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16