Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 09:06
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$209
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,102
97% 827 Pts
64-Core 2,275
141% 2,275 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 48.5
39% 49.8 fps
MRender 48.3
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 56.9
43% 51.3 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 309 310 310 311 309 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,161
Write 1,457
Mixed 1,261
SusWrite 484
298% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 92.4
311% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,173
DQ Mixed 1,015
781% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 261%
Great: 280%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 399 404 414 406 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 408
Write 353
Mixed 121
SusWrite 400
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 2.5
40% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 54.6
DQ Write 20.6
DQ Mixed 4.7
12% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 93%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB
250GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.5% Very poor
Read 41.6
Write 42
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 41.9
9% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 13.8
45% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 26.6
DQ Mixed 11.5
13% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 87%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 56 61 53 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 128
Write 50.5
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 54.1
61% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.5
197% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 208%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
46GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 114
Write 12
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 11.7
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 59
MC Mixed 35.6
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 11.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback