MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime3 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 13:36
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,057
99% 826 Pts
64-Core 1,464
91% 1,464 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 157
Parallax 159
134% 160 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
120% 151 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 958 700 706 709 704 703 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1061
Write 1,579
Mixed 602
SusWrite 747
225% 997 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 48
187% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 863
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 710
538% 729 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 178%
Great: 277%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
203GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 450 451 452 441 341 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 446
Mixed 436
SusWrite 431
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 45.5
167% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
469GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1807 1804 1797 1809 1802 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,803
Mixed 1,348
SusWrite 1,533
345% 1,525 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 74.5
255% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 776
561% 726 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 261%
Great: 305%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2510 2538 2537 2538 2541 2541 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 1,397
Write 2,408
Mixed 1,493
SusWrite 2,534
446% 1,958 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 74.7
252% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 803
605% 814 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 325%
Great: 368%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 138 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 145
Mixed 82
SusWrite 137
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,484
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback