Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 05:35
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 606
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 245
Parallax 309
229% 278 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 236
Splatting 174
193% 246 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 194%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 378 381 386 388 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 445
Mixed 344
SusWrite 382
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 40
134% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 339
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
431GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 388 388 395 395 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 434
Mixed 393
SusWrite 392
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 48.9
161% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 343
258% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
238GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 387 388 396 395 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 438
Mixed 351
SusWrite 392
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 39.6
139% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 340
258% 348 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 15
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $1,193
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback