Performance Results


Gaming 163% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 144% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B17
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B17) (all builds)
Memory	58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '21 at 21:08
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 82.8 1-Core 141 2-Core 236 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 696 73% 585 Pts	64-Core 894 55% 894 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	195% Outstanding	Lighting 273 Reflection 278 Parallax 337 222% 296 fps	MRender 357 Gravity 259 Splatting 188 210% 268 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 280GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1005 1120 1676 1723 1740 1608 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 2,016 Write 1,677 Mixed 778 SusWrite 1,479 332% 1,487 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 58.6 189% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,092 DQ Write 802 DQ Mixed 954 711% 949 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 393%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 302GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 49 82 72 91 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 44.2 Write 119 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 71.1 50% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 108%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 119 117 122 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 85.5 Write 102 Mixed 56 SusWrite 118 66% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 2,641 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	65% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 20 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 19.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	759x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	589x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	576x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	577x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	433x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	407x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	364x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	309x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	261x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $840

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16