Acer Aspire E1-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 49%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_HR
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 23:33
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 134
58% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 189
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 128
9% 128 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT620M
Acer(1025 064A) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 2.4
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 0.2
4% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 25 30 37 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 14.2
Write 24.1
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 29.1
15% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.3
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire E1-571G Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 54%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $200
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback