Lenovo 2349P60

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2349P60  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349P60
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 21:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 48.9
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 116
50% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 213
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.2
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 240GB-$81
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 524ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 207 197 204 212 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 322
Write 135
Mixed 240
SusWrite 206
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 15.8
62% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 264
194% 255 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback