Lenovo 4105E6G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4105E6G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110523
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5620
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 127
60% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 308
32% 258 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
EVGA(3842 2791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.2% Average
Lighting 50.7
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 71.4
41% 62.8 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 57.6
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 480GB-$256
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 130 157 158 170 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 220
Write 154
Mixed 178
SusWrite 150
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 16.5
54% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 117
83% 107 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
898GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 95 99 100 97 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 88.4
Write 87.1
Mixed 29
SusWrite 93.6
54% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
241GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 75 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 75.8
Write 75.2
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 73.1
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate BUP RD 5TB
538GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 22 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 23.4
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 21.4
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
133% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 68%
TDKMedia Gold 3.0 16GB
3GB free, PID 069c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7.8 7.9 7.9 8 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.4% Very poor
Read 33
Write 22.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 8.3
26% 21 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.6
113% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback