Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4400-$108 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 36.2 1-Core 19.7 2-Core 41.6 21% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 36.9 8-Core 36.1 5% 36.5 Pts	64-Core 28.5 2% 28.5 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 349C) 512MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.2 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.23 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.9 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.02E04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 19 8 6.4 12 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 35%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB 7,454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 12GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 5 6.9 7.2 7.5 5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 1,260 Write 5.2 SusWrite 5.3 282% 423 MB/s	4K Read 213 4K Mixed 0 1,183% 106 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Mass Storage Device 1TB 3,987 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 549GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 22 22 22 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.67 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16