PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | To Intel X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200330 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 10 '21 at 13:22 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SA400S37/120GB 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0719A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 35 43 2.6 44 30 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$32
94GB free
Firmware: 78.06F.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 49 49 47 46 MB/s
|
35.8%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HDT721025SLA380 250GB-$105
119GB free
Firmware: STBOA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s
|
49.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.5%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 502x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 214x |
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 140x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 112x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $200Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 89x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $168 |