PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
Memory | 68.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191029 |
Uptime | 2.5 Days |
Run Date | Apr 21 '21 at 12:42 |
Run Duration | 344 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 96% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$90
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 92 91 96 100 MB/s
|
26.9%
Poor
|
|||
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$114
263GB free
Firmware: 7ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 114 108 118 124 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
293GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 80 85 82 85 85 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 5TB
27GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 24 25 23 24 MB/s
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 32 31 30 30 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate IronWolf 12TB (2017)-$138
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 32 31 30 31 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 126 125 133 142 MB/s
|
82.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 128 127 137 145 MB/s
|
76.7%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
54GB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 99 129 110 128 127 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
61GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 23 23 21 22 MB/s
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
110GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 24 24 22 24 MB/s
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 23 23 22 22 MB/s
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 150x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 145x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 129x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 165x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 111x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |