Asrock 870 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 870 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100914
Uptime	8.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '17 at 21:08
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 47.9 2-Core 95 46% 71.8 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 259 27% 215 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.2% Very good	Lighting 96.4 Reflection 109 Parallax 103 78% 103 fps	MRender 94.3 Gravity 93.2 Splatting 96 78% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 318 Write 349 Mixed 195 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 13.9 65% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 82.7 DQ Mixed 15.4 22% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 101%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 177GB free Firmware: CP100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 56.6 Write 61 Mixed 56.7 44% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.26 68% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 43%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 272GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 185 182 3750 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6437 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12901 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3934 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 68 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 141 141 178163 (C2) HDA temperature 111 101 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.2% Below average	Read 65.6 Write 63.5 Mixed 30.5 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.34 96% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 54%
WD Elements 25A2 1.5TB 2,275 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 27.8 Mixed 23.4 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 CT51264BA160BJ.C8 8GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 10.3 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.4 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	15x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 193 samples	3x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	2x

RAM
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 4GBUnknownBench 31%, 4 samples	2x
99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 6GBKingstonBench 50%, 4 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 42%, 629 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $112

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16