| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Gigabyte AX370M-Gaming 3 |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200702 |
| Uptime | 15.6 Days |
| Run Date | May 01 '21 at 09:15 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83.3%
Excellent
|
94% 177 Pts
|
82% 671 Pts
|
66% 1061 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
|
32%
Below average
|
34% 41.6 fps
|
29% 35.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 128 124 124 120 116 MB/s
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
57% 258 MB/s
|
141% 51 MB/s
|
132% 190 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
197GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 105 107 106 106 MB/s
|
79.2%
Very good
|
93% 127 MB/s
|
237% 1.8 MB/s
| |
|
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 197 204 204 201 198 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
109% 150 MB/s
|
90% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$130
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.7%
Good
|
69% 24.1 GB/s
|
61% 21.5 GB/s
|
41% 98.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 171 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 37x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 24x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 13x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 13x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $345 |